Tesla Autopilot, comparable automated driving programs rated ‘poor’ by security group

Spread the love

The Insurance coverage Institute for Freeway Security rolled out a brand new security score system for partial automated driving programs, and the primary checks didn’t go nicely for Tesla – or almost any of the electric vehicle big’s rivals.

Beneath the system, the IIHS assigns the programs a score of excellent, acceptable, marginal or poor primarily based on its safeguards, and not one of the automated programs landed an general score of “good.”

The inside of a Tesla Mannequin S is proven in autopilot mode in San Francisco, California, on April 7, 2016.  (REUTERS/Alexandria Sage/File Picture / Reuters Photographs)

Of the 14 programs rated, 11 had been discovered to be “poor,” together with Tesla’s Autopilot and its Full Self-Driving model, which is in beta testing, together with Nissan’s ProPILOT Help 2.0, Mercedes-Benz’s Lively Distance Help DISTRONIC with Lively Steering Help, Ford’s BlueCruise and BMW’s Lively Driving Assistant.


The one system that carried out worse than Tesla’s, in line with the findings, was Volvo’s Pilot Help.

Close-up of Tesla Motors logo on a building

Shut-up of the Tesla Motors emblem towards a shiny blue sky in Pleasanton, California, on July 23, 2018.  ((Picture by Smith Assortment/Gado/Getty Photos) / Getty Photos)

Ticker Safety Final Change Change %
TSLA TESLA INC. 177.77 +2.43 +1.39%

However the three remaining programs didn’t obtain glowing evaluations from the IIHS, both.


The highest system was Lexus’ Teammate with Superior Drive, which was deemed an general score of “acceptable.” The No. 2 spot went to Normal Motors’ Tremendous Cruise, and Nissan’s ProPILOT Help with Navi-link got here in third – each programs obtained scores of “marginal” from the IIHS.

Ticker Safety Final Change Change %
GM GENERAL MOTORS CO. 39.18 -0.34 -0.86%
F FORD MOTOR CO. 12.11 -0.07 -0.57%

“Some drivers might really feel that partial automation makes lengthy drives simpler, however there’s little proof it makes driving safer,” IIHS President David Harkey stated. “As many high-profile crashes have illustrated, it may introduce new dangers when programs lack the suitable safeguards.”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk attends an event

Tesla CEO Elon Musk attends an occasion throughout the Vivatech know-how startups and innovation honest in Paris on June 16, 2023.  ((Picture by JOEL SAGET/AFP by way of Getty Photos) / Getty Photos)

Tesla and its chief govt, Elon Musk, have stated {that a} Tesla working with Autopilot engaged is about 10 occasions safer than the U.S. common and 5 occasions safer than a Tesla with out the know-how enabled. Federal regulators are investigating almost 1,000 accidents by which Tesla’s Autopilot was in use.

The IIHS reported that it expects producers will proceed to enhance their programs’ security options, and famous that the 2 Tesla programs it examined used software program that preceded the corporate’s newest software program replace from December.


Each automaker that responded to FOX Enterprise’ requests for touch upon the IIHS report touted their commitments to security.

Nissan added in its assertion that the corporate is “evaluating the outcomes from the first-ever Partial Automation Safeguards take a look at and can proceed to work with IIHS in all issues associated to buyer security.”

Ford stated, “We’ve been working carefully with IIHS since BlueCruise was launched in 2021. Whereas we don’t agree with IIHS’s findings, we are going to take their suggestions into consideration as we proceed to judge future updates.”

Mercedes-Benz famous in its assertion that “This new IIHS testing methodology doesn’t assess the efficiency of the driving force help programs, as an alternative it focuses on safeguards to stop misuse. We take the findings of the IIHS partial driving automation safeguard scores very significantly.”

A Volvo spokesperson stated in a press release that “At Volvo Automobiles we imagine a automobile is both autonomous or not, and on the time we don’t promote any vehicles with what we think about to be autonomous driving options.” They added, “We’re completely satisfied to see that IIHS is proposing countermeasures and take a look at protocols in search of to scale back the prevalence of each overreliance on and misuse of any driving help programs.”

Tesla, BMW, and Normal Motors didn’t instantly reply to FOX Enterprise’ request for touch upon the findings.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *