The £8.2bn stealth tax that each household in Britain is paying

Spread the love

The earnings and share costs of the nation’s main insurance coverage firms are booming as they impose ever-higher premiums on clients.

But it surely’s not simply the insurers which can be reaping the rewards of this premium bonanza — the Authorities can be rubbing its palms in glee.

Figures launched by the Workplace for Funds Duty (OBR) — in response to the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Funds — present that the taxes the Authorities is producing from insurance coverage premiums are at the moment larger than from a lot despised inheritance tax.

The present income from insurance coverage premium tax (IPT) levied on gross sales of most sorts of insurance coverage cowl stands at a staggering £8.2 billion a yr — £0.6 billion greater than the tax raid on household inheritances, and never far behind the tax obtained from tobacco gross sales (£8.8 billion).

In quite simple phrases, the larger premiums that insurers cost their clients, the larger the Authorities’s tax-take.

Stealth seize: The taxes the Authorities is producing from insurance coverage premiums are at the moment larger than from a lot despised inheritance tax

Within the tax yr ending April 2023, IPT receipts totalled £7.5billion whereas ten years in the past, within the tax yr ending April 2014, they had been only a tad over £3billion.

Moreover, in keeping with the OBR, the annual tax seize from IPT will proceed to rise over the subsequent 5 years to £8.8 billion within the tax yr ending April 2029.

It’s a win-win for insurers and the cash males on the Treasury – and it’s a scenario that’s starting to anger stress teams representing the aged and the financially challenged.

They ALL consider the regressive tax is unfair on these with low incomes and stretched family funds.

Some additionally passionately argue that the Authorities has intentionally turned a blind eye to rampant insurance coverage premiums as a result of larger costs imply a larger tax-take.

IPT is at the moment charged at 12 per cent on mainstream insurance policies similar to family, motor, non-public medical and pet cowl. Some covers, similar to journey insurance coverage, entice a 20 per cent cost.

Slightly than take up the tax themselves, insurers robotically add it on to clients’ payments.

Insurances which can be exempt from the tax embody well being insurance policies similar to life cowl, important sickness cowl and revenue safety, too.

Though greater than 4 in 5 households pay the tax, two thirds of individuals have little — or no — data of it, although it’s spelt out in paperwork they obtain after they take out or renew cowl.

The Affiliation of British Insurers (ABI) has dubbed it the nation’s ‘hidden-in-plain-sight’ tax.

The ABI hoped that Chancellor Jeremy Hunt would minimize IPT in final week’s Funds, arguing that the tax ‘penalises individuals and companies for being accountable’.

It even designed its personal campaigning ‘mascot’ Snippy (a pair of scissors with eyes) to press for the minimize. However Snippy didn’t win over Mr Hunt.

But, within the wake of the Chancellor’s Funds, it hasn’t stopped a glut of economic specialists from nonetheless calling for the tax to be revamped or lowered — sooner fairly than later.

Public purse: The present income from insurance coverage premium tax levied on gross sales of most sorts of insurance coverage cowl stands at a staggering £8.2bn a yr

James Daley, director of cash campaigning group Fairer Finance, says that now could be the ‘proper time’ for the Authorities to take a look at adjustments to IPT.

He informed Cash Mail yesterday: ‘A rising variety of individuals are struggling to afford insurance coverage cowl, notably automotive insurance coverage which is necessary.

‘Individuals depend on their automotive to get to work, store and take kids to high school. I feel it’s right down to the Authorities to take motion to assist struggling households and pensioners — and cuts to IPT are a simple approach to do this.’

The newest knowledge from comparability web site Confused.com reveals that the common value of automotive insurance coverage is now £995 — 58 per cent larger than a yr in the past.

Costs, the agency says, are at their highest stage because it began compiling knowledge 18 years in the past. Each the younger and previous are bearing the brunt of this surge in premiums.

Mr Daley’s view is shared by Ian Hughes, of insurance coverage consultancy Shopper Intelligence. ‘IPT is a tax on a few of the most susceptible members of society — those that are younger or who’ve had insurance coverage claims and are actually paying extra for canopy,’ he says.

‘There should be a extra equitable approach for the Authorities to lift money.’ Dennis Reed is director of Silver Voices, a marketing campaign group representing the aged. He doesn’t mince his phrases.

‘It’s stunning that the taxman is reaping the monetary advantages of the rapacious features at the moment being made by insurers,’ he informed Cash Mail.

‘As an alternative of smugly pocketing these tax revenues, the Authorities ought to be clamping down on the unjustifiable hikes in premiums being imposed on many aged individuals, particularly those that drive effectively into their 70s.’

He added: ‘The prices of all types of insurance coverage have gotten prohibitive and leaving susceptible individuals financially uncovered. This problem must be addressed, even when it means much less income for the Treasury.’

A regulatory crackdown on residence and automotive insurance coverage pricing was launched simply over two years in the past by the Monetary Conduct Authority (FCA).

The purpose was to make sure loyal clients not paid extra for his or her coverage at renewal than somebody shopping for equivalent cowl from the identical insurer for the primary time.

Driving costs: The latest data from comparison website Confused.com shows that the average cost of car insurance is now £995 — 58% higher than a year ago

Driving prices: The newest knowledge from comparability web site Confused.com reveals that the common value of automotive insurance coverage is now £995 — 58% larger than a yr in the past

Though it stated the transfer would save policyholders £4.2 billion over the subsequent ten years, all of the proof to date suggests in any other case.

Over the previous yr, common premiums for residence and automotive insurance coverage have leapt by 41 computer (in keeping with Shopper Intelligence) and 58 per cent respectively — leading to report quantities of IPT flowing into the Treasury’s coffers.

As Cash Mail has repeatedly highlighted for the reason that FCA’s guidelines got here in originally of 2022, the one approach most policyholders have been in a position to preserve insurance coverage prices vaguely underneath management is by procuring round — or trimming the breadth of their cowl.

The insurance coverage business’s impolite monetary well being was highlighted six days in the past when Admiral Group reported 2023 earnings of £443 million, a 22 per cent enhance on the yr earlier than. Admiral’s UK manufacturers embody Diamond, Elephant and Veygo.

The numbers prompted funding financial institution Berenberg to color a rosy future for the insurer, forecasting a step up in earnings over the subsequent two years to about £760 million.

Shares in Admiral, a FTSE100-listed firm, have now risen 43 per cent over the previous yr.

Rival Direct Line — a bunch comprising insurance coverage manufacturers Churchill and Privilege — has additionally attracted bid curiosity from Belgian rival Ageas.

IPT was launched 30 years in the past by John Main’s Conservative authorities. The preliminary levy was simply 2.5 per cent, so an annual premium of £100 would entice a tax cost of £2.50 and an general invoice of £102.50.

B ut successive Chancellors of the Exchequer since 1994 have ratcheted up the fee. The present 12 per cent customary charge was launched in January 2017 whereas the 20 per cent larger charge band got here in at January 2011.

It applies to journey insurance coverage, electrical items cowl and automotive insurance coverage that’s purchased by a dealership.

Though all of the specialists contacted by Cash Mail again a discount in IPT on equity grounds, some consider it is going to be a tough activity to realize.

As one stated: ‘I wish to assist shoppers paying much less for insurance coverage by the abolition of IPT, however I can’t hear anybody suggesting how this Authorities — or for that matter the subsequent one — finds the £8 billion a yr it might value.’

The Treasury stated it stored all taxes underneath evaluation, however reform resulting in any loss in tax income must be fiscally balanced to keep up financial stability.

It added: ‘Insurance coverage premium tax, which contributes £8 billion a yr in the direction of important public providers, types only one a part of the general value of insurance coverage and the extent to which it’s handed on to clients is a call for insurers.

Different elements affecting the worth of insurance coverage embody the extent of competitors available in the market.’

  • Do you suppose insurance coverage premium tax ought to be scrapped? E-mail: jeff.prestridge@dailymail.co.uk

Some hyperlinks on this article could also be affiliate hyperlinks. In the event you click on on them we might earn a small fee. That helps us fund This Is Cash, and preserve it free to make use of. We don’t write articles to advertise merchandise. We don’t enable any industrial relationship to have an effect on our editorial independence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *